COMMENTARY
EDITORIAL
๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ง๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ ๐จ๐ ๐ข ๐๐ก๐ข
The Governor’s plan to engage over 2,200 village youth presidents as intelligence officers within the Ibom Community Watch is both strategic and practical. These young leaders live among the people, understand the peculiarities of their communities, and are often the first to notice unusual movements or suspicious activities. By providing them with proper training in intelligence gathering and community surveillance, the government is creating a network capable of supporting conventional security agencies with timely and reliable information.
Across the country, security agencies are often stretched by limited manpower and the growing sophistication of criminal activities. Community-based intelligence gathering has repeatedly proven to be one of the most effective tools in preventing crime and responding swiftly to emerging threats. Akwa Ibom’s initiative recognizes this reality and seeks to bridge the gap between local communities and formal security institutions. It is a model that could serve as a valuable reference point for other states grappling with similar security concerns.
By enhancing security, the programme also offers an important economic benefit. The engagement of thousands of village youth presidents creates opportunities for gainful involvement and productive service. At a time when youth unemployment remains a concern, such an initiative provides a platform for young people to contribute meaningfully to society while earning a livelihood. It reinforces the principle that youth should not merely be seen as beneficiaries of government programmes but as active partners in governance and community development.
The Governor’s concern over the vandalization of public facilities such as schools and community infrastructure is equally valid. Public assets belong to the people and represent investments funded by taxpayers. When such facilities are destroyed, entire communities suffer. Assigning responsibility and accountability at the village level can help foster a stronger sense of ownership and vigilance, ensuring that public property is protected and preserved for future generations.
However, the success of this initiative will depend largely on the commitment, discipline, and integrity of the youths selected to serve. The role of an intelligence officer demands responsibility, confidentiality, patriotism, and a deep sense of duty. Those entrusted with this assignment must resist any temptation to abuse their position or allow political, ethnic, or personal interests to interfere with their responsibilities.
They must understand that they are being called upon to serve not just the government, but their communities and the state as a whole.

